It is impossible to predict what people will say next when their refusal to tell the truth is demonstrable. Take for example President B. Obama’s ravings (apparently based on inside information) about possible future rulings of the US Supreme Court. Obama is supposed to be a lawyer. How can he possibly be so ignorant as to misconstrue and diminish the role of judicial review in Constitutional government?
If Obama believes we are that ignorant what will he believe next? Does Obama believe people cannot Google? Easily found answers on the web point us to government statistics showing that from 1789 to 2001 the US Supreme Court declared a total of 1,315 state, local and federal laws to be unconstitutional.
But what’s new? We see the same sort of lying and deceit in the form of government-sponsored fearmongering concerning the science of global warming.
Government-funded schoolteachers are teaching the children that humans who are guilty of nothing more than going about the business of living are destroying our Earth. A few years ago the schoolteachers’ official name for the crime that humans are allegedly guilty of committing was changed from ‘global warming’ to ‘climate change.’ More recently and for increased effect as a tool of propaganda the official pseudoscience authoritarians of government-sponsored climate porn began blaming human activity for causing ‘calamitous climate disruption.’
AT WHAT POINT DOES GLOBAL WARMING PSEUDOSCIENCE CROSS THE LINE FROM ‘POLITICS AS USUAL’ AND MORE ACCURATELY IS SEEN AS THE USUAL FRAUD AND CORRUPTION WE EXPECT FROM IMMORAL AND EVIL PEOPLE? When should the behavior of a ‘True Believer’ global warming alarmist be seen as something qualitatively different from an ignorant and superstitious prognosticator of doomsday? When is such behavior seen as immoral according to the traditional principles of Judeo/Christian ethics because the real intent is to gain power over others by hindering the finding of truth and purposefully perpetuating superstition and ignorance for money and power?
If True Believers of global warming believe human activities in businesses and workplaces in the free enterprise sector are evil because people there produce CO2, it is only logical that if evil does exist we may well find it elsewhere–indeed, mostly elsewhere. It certainly is not unusual for those who are really guilty of crimes to proclaim their innocence and blame others for their evil deeds. When do we realize that those who cast producers of CO2 as evil villains are the real evildoers?