Is humanity destroying Earth? Is a tinfoil hat Leftists’ modern version of Noah’s ark? You judge.
Do you believe the opinions of deniers of nature and the proselytizers of a socio-economic ideology that has been used for years by the followers of Marx to justify godless anti-humanism and the killing of millions? The Left fears facts–especially those that people can easily grasp without the help from bureaucrats and politically correct government science.
What we know:
“On secular, millenarian and larger time scales astronomical oscillations and solar changes drive climate variations. Shaviv’s theory  can explain the large 145 Myr climate oscillations during the last 600 million years. Milankovic’s theory  can explain the multi-millennial climate oscillations observed during the last 1000 kyr. Climate oscillations with periods of 2500, 1500, and 1000 years during the last 10,000 year (the Holocene) are correlated to equivalent solar cycles that caused the Minoan, Roman, Medieval and Modern warm periods [Bond et al., 2001; Kerr, 2001]. Finally, several other authors found that multisecular solar oscillations caused bisecular little ice ages (for example: the Spörer, Maunder, Dalton minima) during the last 1000 years [for example: Eddy, 1976; Eichler et al., 2009; Scafetta and West, 2007; Scafetta, 2009, 2010].”
(Scarfetta N. Empirical evidence for a celestial origin of the climate oscillations and its implications. JASTP 2010 Apr.)
The public has been deceived by a sordid international crew of pseudo-science liberal fascists and academics, inept and corrupt politicians and superstitious enviro-crackpots. The simple facts are as follows:
- The Medieval Warm Period 1000 years ago was warmer than today
- The Holocene Optimum from 3000 to 8000 years ago was warmer than today
- The last three Interglacial periods were warmer than the current one
- The claimed 0.6 °C rise due to AGW–government scientists `lost’ the data
- Four of the warmest years ever in the US were in the 1930s not the ’90s
- 1934 was the warmest in the US not 1998 as claimed
- The GISS adjusted historic data down to make the modern record look warmer
- Temperature increases before CO2 increases in all records
- CO2 levels 388 ppm are lowest in 300 million years
- There’s a limit of at most 1.4 °C of temperature increase even if CO2 triples
- From 1900-40 CO2 production was low but temperatures increased the most
- From 1940-80 CO2 production was up the most but temperatures went down
- GCMs predict the atmosphere warms faster than the surface but it’s the opposite
- Earth has been in a cooling for a decade, confounding IPCC predictions
- FOI2009 CRUgate disclosures show fraud, collusion and misrepresentation by government-funded climatologists.
(For reference, See–i.e.: Dr. T. Ball: “These are more than enough facts to show the hypothesis is wrong. Polls indicate the public is learning, but AGW proponents and politicians are not and continue to push their political agendas”)
Why would anyone perpetrate a hoax with the intent to deceive the public? First of all–unfortunately–fooling Americans is an increasingly easy thing to do (the nationwide high school dropout rate is 25%). In the past an average person with little or no formal education knew enough to be rightly suspicious of something that smells like a hoax (a high school graduate in the 60s knew more about climate change than today’s college professors–scientists outside Western academia have likened modern climatology to the ancient science of astrology). Why would any believe in something that is supported only by science authoritarians in the West and by pathetic, self-defeating losers like Gore, Obama and the Democrat party who loathe America and who pray only for catastrophe as they worship at the altar of the ‘hockey stick’ (despite the fact it is a proven scientific fraud)? How can anyone fall for the hyping of non-existent dangers to manufacture a crisis for the sole purpose of increasing taxes and fees to fuel the bloated, self-serving government bureaucracy and rob individuals of political power?
When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question. ~Hal Lewis
When science promotes a view that would condemn the people in the developing countries to a future of misery, poverty and death you know there is more to the story, right? UN support for such insanity should be all you need to know–that it is America that has their target on its back (thanks in large part to the leading role of dead and dying Old Europe that needed to pick America’s bones to stay alive): everyone understands that every socialist, communist, autocratic and dictatorial country in the UN hates America, right? That is why they all hated Bush. That is why they gave Obama the Nobel prize in 2009 and to Gore and the IPCC before that.
We’ve had a Greenhouse Theory with no evidence to support it-except a moderate warming turned into a scare by computer models whose results have never been verified with real-world events. On the other hand, we have compelling evidence of a real-world climate cycle averaging 1470 years (plus or minus 500) running through the last million years of history. The climate cycle has above all been moderate, and the trees, bears, birds, and humans have quietly adapted. S. Fred Singer
The darkness was lit, bells rung; but, these schoolteachers have fallen asleep–facts are facts: “Two thousand years of published human histories say that the warm periods were good for people. It was the harsh, unstable Dark Ages and Little Ice Age that brought bigger storms, untimely frost, widespread famine and plagues of disease.” ~Dennis Avery
The mid-century (1940-1975) alarm of a coming Ice Age teaches a very important lesson to all of us, including climate researchers. It is not possible to forecast climate change (warming or cooling) in the year 2100 based on a few decades of data alone… Further, it is very confusing that some members of the media and some scientific experts blame ‘global warming’ for every ‘anomalous’ weather change, including big snowfalls, droughts, floods, ice storms, and hurricanes. This only confuses the issue. ~Syun-Ichi Akasofu
Nikola Scafetta describes above the mechanisms comprising coupled oscillators—i.e., cyclic weather patterns that act in concert–that acting collectively and in synchronization explain climate change. It is based on these recurring patterns that Scafetta predicts global cooling to about 2030–2040. Overall the Earth has been in a cooling trend for 10,000 years. Ups and downs along the way, according to Habibullo Abdussamatov, result from the influence of a consecutive chain of changes caused by secondary feedback effects. These effects may amplify normal climatic changes over time and it is for this reason that–for all we know–the present cooling may really be another “Little Ice Age” in the making.
Simply acknowledging historical facts like the existence of the MWP (Medieval Warm Period) and the LIA (Little Ice Age) will help uncloud climate research. How would acknowledging instead of hiding historical facts help? When honor and integrity can no longer be taken as foundational principle all research becomes meaningless. The scientific method depends on honesty. Politics is different–there is no honesty in politics and that is why the politicization of science is the death of science.
We might as well be living in Communist Russia or under the rule of the Pharaohs of Egypt or China’s Chairman Mao or tin-pot dictators like Castro and Chavez. Government schoolteachers stabbed America in the back for money and because they are driven by Leftist ideology and self-defeating liberalism. AGW alarmism is simply a symptom of the real problem–i.e., nothing more than a culture war over the utility of socialism (i.e., state ownership of the fruits of your labor) versus principles of individual liberty (i.e., the basic right to be free that the founders of the country recognized was a right given to all by their Judeo/Christian God). Secular-socialists threw out what’s holy with the holy water and that is why climate science is so god-awful: there is no reverence for what’s truth.
Principles have a way of enduring, as do the few irreducible individuals who maintain allegiance to them. (Christopher Hitchens)