The Left’s new Bible where Al Gore saves the world from global warming and capitalism is a fake. It was designed to extort money from the productive and to excuse a relentless minting of fiat dollars to paper over their unkeepable promises. The scripture comprising the Left’s global warming religion is comprised of new words like decarbonization and sustainability. This new language helps provide a convenient excuse for dwindling wealth and a loss of property, growth, jobs, all resulting from the implementation of a cribbed ideology that is based on the Left’s fear of a free man.
Yes, listen to the Climatists
They have this global warming hypothesis
It explains all changes in the Earth’s climate
Climatists say the sea will rise, polar bears will die
There will be more mosquitoes; and, fewer mosquitoes
Everything is all foreboding
Impending doom is attributed to modernity
Changes in the atmosphere are induced by us humans
Living a good life with plenty is bad for Nature
Climatists need more money to tackle ‘the problem’
All of those affected must be saved from ‘the problem’
Climatists report their hypothesis as ‘scientific fact’
Their hypothesis is strongly supported by Leftists
Leftists say they represent the Global Environmental Community
The problem they talk about is only Political Ecology
And, Climatists want to help the Left consolidate political power
But, the Climatists’ hypothesis is a myth
(See—e.g., Stott and Sullivan, ‘Political Ecology: Science, Myth and Power’)
The Science behind the Global Warming hoax has been god-awful. First Climatists collected data. The data was adjusted. And, then the adjustments were adjusted — all without the slightest explanation or footnote to anything authoritative that would provide a sensible explanation that any reasonable person might rely upon to justify making changes willy-nilly to the raw data. Then, the original data was simply lost. That’s how everything and everyone works on the Left. The willy-nilly science of the Left goes beyond CRUgate: we now have GREENHOUSEgate in the White House.
The idea of comparing the Earth to a greenhouse is an analogy. But it is a false analogy. So to any real scientist a belief in global warming must be seen as myth, delusion, superstition, ignorance or worse: explainable only as something that con artists found to be useful to run a sting on the people. And, a complicit academia is guilty of assisting in the deception.
A few days ago we saw in the UK’s Daily Mail this headline: Could we face gas rationing? British gas reserves could run dry in 36 HOURS after freezing householders turn the heating up. We’re worried for nothing about global warming and we’re wasting the resources we need to face whatever Nature brings our way. Weather is capricious.
From the 25.03.13 DIE WELT (’The World’) we see in an article by Ulli Kulke this translated headline: Scientists warn of ice age — Minus 19 degrees in Brandenburg, mild temperatures in southern Germany. What is going on with the weather?
The article begins with a description of last month in Germany — perhaps the coldest, snowiest ever but certainly the worst since records were first kept 100 years ago. It also was very cold in Northeastern United States and northern Russia and more experts now believe it is not human activity after-all that is causing the cold. The cooling trend is because the activity of the Sun has significantly weakened much like it did several hundred years ago, during the so-called, Little Ice Age.
Rather than variations in the warming rays of the Sun (as it is our understanding that solar radiance alone is not sufficient to explain climate change over the centuries), it is fluctuations in solar emissions of ionizing radiation — the so-called solar wind — that is the big decider. Associated with the ups and downs of the number of sunspots it now seems to be fluctuations in solar activity that explains climate change –i.e., the ionizing solar wind affects cloud formation and hence the temperature on Earth which is buffered by the effects of the huge water masses comprising the oceans that serve to delay the affects of fluctuating solar activity on the Earth’s climate.
Still, the Left is obsessed with this one-dimensional view of the world where human activity causes global warming on Earth. The IPCC and the Left must continue to see, man-made emissions of carbon dioxide as almost the sole driver of climate, even as more scientists have come to understand that humanity’s CO2 no longer plays a role. The article quotes two University of Washington climate research scientists with published finding that show the “anthropogenic percentage of global warming has been overrated in the second half of the 20th century probably by a factor of two,” and other scientists are coming to similar conclusions–e.g.,
In the next few weeks a study of the University of Oslo comes to a similar conclusion. Even a doubling of CO2 would not have a dramatic impact between now and 2050 but it says a lot that the IPCC does not talk about it. The influence of natural factors, as clouds or volcanic eruptions, is far stronger than previously assumed. This is according to recent studies that appear more frequently that follow all the rules of Science (“peer reviewed”) but get no headlines…