Stop saying, global warming is nothing but
a hoax and a scare tactic.
Don’t say, EPA acts like little Eichmanns
and Hitler was a socialist.
Freedom dies a little bit every day. Censored or not, when putting the liberal fascism of today’s secular socialists into a proper historical perspective we cannot avoid seeing the socialism of the Left has a horrible record. And, we’re falling into the moral abyss, again. If we can dare to look at the inhumanity of socialism in the eye we certainly won’t fear words when media-supported propaganda by government scientists concerning climate change signals a federal government out of control and the coming of the jackboot on the throat of a free society.
Global warming is not a problem. Fear of it is. Government-sponsored fearmongering that modernity for more humans is bad for the Earth because of humanity’s CO2 (AGW) is more alarming than global warming. Too many in the government-education industry have countenanced too many lies for too long. And, our inability to talk about it honestly is the big, looming disaster. It is the only disaster.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Don’t get bees in your bonnet. “It’s hard to believe that people can do these kinds of things to one another, but human experience indicates that it happens all the time. Lenin killed tens of thousands of his own people. Stalin killed tens of millions. Mao killed many more. Hitler fits in somewhere between Lenin and Stalin. But proportionately, the Khmer Rouge are the champions.” ~L. Neil Smith
The above may be deleted in a forum on global warming as a divisive element. You know why: sure, sure I wrote down the names Lenin, Stalin and Mao and the Khmer Rouge but it is including the name of Hitler in a list of socialist killers that brings down Maxwell’s silver hammer upon all of our heads and smashing all the bees in our immoderate bonnets. We need no more proof that global warming alarmism is Leftist academia’s version of medieval madness when a single word is the bulls’ red cape to Leftists who routinely and dismissively refer to all scientific skeptics as deniers.
Surely no one believes the above mass killers had respect for human dignity. Perhaps word-gamers want to argue Nadolf Nitler was to the right of Lenin. We know he, the National Socialist German Workers’ Party and all secular socialists are far to the left of the beliefs of the nation’s founders that individual liberty is the God-given right of all humanity that cannot be taken away by government and more important than the consensus.
We have reached the point where more good is done in the world feeding one stray cat than wasting one more tax dollar on climatology. We denialists of global warming could apologize for the Left’s Weltschmertz out of sympathy but letting them know the polar bears are actually thriving would be the empathetic thing to do. We don’t need their coats to stay warm, nor do we need liberal fascist gadflies to weave hairshirts for the rest of us to wear as they look down their effete snob noses at the rest of us who actually make things that society wants.
Still, how do we denialists break the news to a gullible public that the Leftist philosophy of liberal Utopia is a chimera. How came we to this? The Left continues to deny…
...you can disprove a theory by finding even a single observation that disagrees with the predictions of the theory. ~Stephen Hawking
The simple fact is, we the people have not changed much over the last 2000 years. We’ve been down this road before. Storms have been knocking down houses for 1,000s of years and there are only so many responses to that. Crazy as it sounds it is not a new idea to point at someone to blame for causing a storm–e.g., according to wiki Moses also used fear to accomplish his aims by taking responsibility for nine plagues that occurred back then, the seventh of which was a storm.
In effect what Moses did is not that much different from what the Left does in attempting to increase political power to accomplish Leftist goals by pretending the productive are responsible for a storm. At least the motives of Moses were laudable: he was trying to free his people from tyranny. For a while, like a modern-day Moses we also had George Bush who stood up to the UN/Eurocommie/Academics of global warming and demanded that the Left, let his people go. Global warming is history not science–e.g., from wiki (based on verses in Exodus), is the following:
“Therefore, at this time tomorrow I will send the worst hailstorm that has ever fallen on Egypt, from the day it was founded till now. Give an order now to bring your livestock and everything you have in the field to a place of shelter, because the hail will fall on every man and animal that has not been brought in and is still out in the field, and they will die… hail fell and lightning flashed back and forth. It was the worst storm in all the land of Egypt since it had become a nation.”
The Left wants to set the world’s climate policy based on the most absurd claim of all. Only in the history of Michael Mann can Leftists control the weather 50 to 100 years from now by taking control of the free enterprise economy today. How do we combat such lunacy? Must we communicate in obscure symbols and use special code words to get out the truth to the people that the Pharaohs of Global Warming are coming–e.g.,
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Khmer Rouge, Nadolf Nitler, EPA, Al Gore — seeing today’s liberal fascism in historical perspective we cannot avoid seeing the secular, socialism of the Left and it’s horrible record of atrocities measured in millions of deaths
“No model’s predictions should be trusted unless the model has demonstrated forecasting skill. But climate models have not existed for 20, 50 or 100 years… Simply, the climate models’ predictions of the future have the same demonstrated reliability as the casting of chicken bones to predict the future.” ~Richard Courtney
A common sense observation is that the global warming extremists do everything possible to marginalize legitimate debate and discredit real science. The extremists lied about a consensus and made up graphs to scare children using phony data and various parameters and mathematical methods that simply go missing when they can no longer be hidden from disclosure.
“The accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC],” says Professor Bob Carter, environmental scientist at James Cook University, “show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998 [and]… lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements, if corrected for non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, show little if any global warming since 1979… In one of the more expensive ironies of history,” Carter says, “the expenditure of more than $US50 billion … on research into global warming since 1990 has failed to demonstrate any human-caused climate trend, let alone a dangerous one.”
And the question we should be asking our politicians are, what climate are you actually aiming to produce and when we get there won’t it change anyway? (Philip Stott)
Should we fabricate all manner of consensus opinions among scientists by abandoning the scientific method altogether? Perhaps we should lower scientific standards of significance to areas outside of the science of climate change so we can easily come to simple consensus opinions in other areas like medicine, aeronautics, engineering and economics.
Even if CO2 concentration doubles or triples, the effect on temperature would be minimal. The relationship between temperature and CO2 is like painting a window black to block sunlight. The first coat blocks most of the light. Second and third coats reduce very little more. Current CO2 levels are like the first coat of black paint. (Dr. Timothy Ball)
There have been many ups and downs with increasing warming since the LIA and a cooling trend over the last 10,000 years. And, no one knows when the next ice age will be. Everyone should know, however, that the next ice age may be overdue and that we all should enjoy global warming while it lasts.
CO2 is not the problem… the Greenhouse Effect is present but essentially constant over time, therefore temperature variations are due to some other cause… If you want to block light coming through a window a single coat of black paint will stop almost all of it. Second and third coats reduce the light but by decreasing fractions. The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is like the first coat of paint – doubling and tripling the amount reduces heat going to space by decreasing fractions. The IPCC got around this problem by incorrectly claiming a positive feedback. This says increased CO2 raises global temperature that increases evaporation of water vapor to the atmosphere. This supposedly enhances the warming due to increased CO2, but the idea is now discredited. (Dr. Tim Ball)
There was a time when we would brand as intellectual dishonesty the spreading of unfounded fears about runaway global warming in the nation’s classrooms and yet teachers and bureaucrats in the government-education complex have been doing that for years. When after a while it was obvious to the teachers of global warming that they were wrong they simply changed their stories.
7. Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers—for example by introducing ad hoc some auxiliary assumption, or by reinterpreting the theory ad hoc in such a way that it escapes refutation. Such a procedure is always possible, but it rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status. ~Karl Popper
Today, proponents of AGW theory simply point to natural disasters as evidence of man-caused climate weirding. That is what now passes for science in today’s classrooms…
… all the people who end up with 2 or even 3 Celsius degrees for the climate sensitivity are just playing the children’s game to scare each other, as Richard Lindzen says, by making artificial biased assumptions about positive feedbacks. There is no reasonable, balanced, and self-consistent work that would lead to such a relatively high sensitivity. (Dr. Lubos Motl)
Global warming has become nothing more than the Left’s permanent campaign against the American free enterprise system and Judeo-Christian heritage. The next time you hear a climatist say warming is Made in America — as if a violent change in the weather is proof of the AGW theory — stop and think for a moment: “The fact is that the ‘null hypothesis’ of global warming has never been rejected: That natural climate variability can explain everything we see in the climate system.” ~Dr. Roy Spencer