Important Message from Mother Nature

AGW Suspended-Energy Rules!

What Consensus?

Let’s not wait for the next ice age to face the facts. “What happens if global temperatures actually decline,” asks David Archibald (Chairman Mao’s Time Bomb), “a possibility that must be considered, given the lack of solar activity and the mercury’s refusal to rise?”

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem… Two recent surveys of meteorologists (summarized here and here) revealed similar skepticism of alarmist global warming claims. (James Taylor, ‘Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis,’ Forbes)

How did we come to this anyway? A lot of serious thinkers tried to tell us academia never really had actual scientific evidence to back up anything they said about global warming and also that the Democrat party was engaging in nothing more than a hoax to scare the public. Global warming has been a Left vs. right issue so it was never a matter of science from the get-go and yet voters continued to return climate hoaxsters to public office. The Left’s scare tactics worked.

“The real scientific method [not, the so called 97% consensus] would have them [scientists] throw out the theory [AGW] and come up with a new one. But the fat cats in government, industry, environmental groups and universities that have benefited from this public scare would have too much too lose… We will pay the price this winter.” ~Joseph D’Aleo

Why did they do it? D’Aleo says they had, too much to lose. Lose what, money? There must be more to it than money to explain the eagerness of academia to stab America in the back and say nothing as the Left lied to the people. “I am often asked,” says Roy Spencer (2010), “So, are you saying there is a conspiracy here?” Spencer says there was no conspiracy, “because the ultimate goals were not a secret. Just a bunch of elitists carrying out plans that the politicians supported – with continuing promises of congressional funding for research that those politicians knew would support Job #1 of government – to stay needed by the people. Many of the scientists involved are just along for a ride on the gravy train. Even I ride that train. The elitism clearly shows through in the behavior of those who speak out publically on the need for humanity to change its Earth-destroying ways: Al Gore, James Cameron, Harrison Ford, Julia Roberts, RFK, Jr.”

The Left does all it can to create panic and sow seeds of mistrust and discontent –e.g., George Bush caused Katrina, death by Ebola in Texas is Rick Perry’s fault, America and capitalism caused global warming (and is killing the polar bears). They say these things because voters who put Barack Obama in the White house for two terms – some of whom are still attending Democrat fund-raisers for Obama at $32,000 a head in places like Hollywood and NY – so badly want to believe America is the cause of all the world’s problems. Let’s face facts: we’re talking about the majority of America’s voters. We’re talking about voters who must hate themselves because they are mainstream America now and they elect those who tell them exactly what they want to hear.

I understand it is important for Hollywood liberals to believe the productive are destroying the globe: they know they’re better than you and me and have no problem voting for those who are eager to tell us what to do. As for the rest we can only assume the Greatest Generation sowed a sack of seeds but let the garden go to weed like Jews building greenhouses in Gaza but instead of tomatoes blooming, scuds rain down.

The weeds believe phasing out fossil fuel power plants and covering energy shortfalls by paying businesses not to produce and purchasing French nuclear power is a smart UK energy plan. If things don’t go as planned the workaround is for the UK’s elderly to burn books if they want to stay warm this winter.

…this coming winter, the gap between peak demand and peak generation will be small. By next winter, the gap will be as little as four per cent… [and] the risk of shortfalls is substantial. However, the lights are unlikely to go out in our homes thanks to a series of emergency measures, which include the ability to bring mothballed coal and gas plants back online, and paying companies to not use electricity – a facility for which National Grid will have to pay those firms fairly handsomely. Moreover, the UK government is investing in more connectors with continental Europe so that shortfalls can be made up with French nuclear power… ~Spiked

Is it politically incorrect to notice that the Left is destroying the country? “[Frank] Furedi’s memories of Canada in the 1960s are of having a nice time as a member of the Far Left — until he realized his red-raggin’ pals had no problem with state interventions in people’s lives. They couldn’t handle the notion that democracy and freedom are non-negotiable.” Why is it politically incorrect to observe that Western academia has for years knowingly abetted the inciting of panic by the Left about global warming?

The government climate scientists had fantastic successes creating something from nothing when they used the idea of a greenhouse as a metaphor for global warming caused by humanity’s release of CO2. They looked on with glee as their idea turned into two ideas: an allegory about capitalism destroying the Earth and an analogy about all life on Earth as like a dog in a car with the windows rolled up. What we’ve learned is that when it comes to metaphor-making, the 2nd law of thermodynamics violates Leftist thinking.

Shall we continue to fear global warming alarmism when we know it does not exist. What will our future look like if a cooler world, “in response to lower solar activity,” is as Archibald observes, more than just a possibility?

China is one of the few countries taking food security seriously. Official policy is that the grain necessary to keep China’s population fed should be grown within its borders. Beijing maintains a grain reserve of 200 million to 300 million tonnes, although its exact size is a state secret… China can feed itself at the moment. But that achievement has to be looked at in the context that the world is currently enjoying the most benign conditions for agriculture for over 800 years. ~David Archibald, Chairman Mao’s Time Bomb

Is it politically incorrect to notice that AGW is Left vs. right science? “[Frank] Furedi was asked to compare current Western censorship with that of Communist-era Hungary, where he spent his childhood,” says Tony Thomas (‘Free Speech and the Fight to Save It,’ Quadrant Online). “Stalinist censorship was easier to deal with, he replied, because everyone knew the score and could see through the official lies.”

Never was there a dogma more calculated to foster indolence,
and to blunt the keen edge of curiosity.
~Charles Lyell,
Principles of Geology (London, 1833)

 

 

Advertisements

About Wagathon

Hot World Syndrome—fear of a hotter, more intimidating world than it actually is prompting a desire for more protection than is warranted by any actual threat. https://twitter.com/Wagathon
This entry was posted in The Cultural Hegemony of Climate Superstition and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s